Aaron Heffernon is listed on Collapsing Horse's website as the designer, so I'm guessing he designed this simple and beautiful set, though as a collaborative project, I'm sure the members of the cast all had a hand in it.
The colours are stark rough white, contrasted with the performer's rich red 16th century style robes. Building on the theme of scholarly work, and the idea of a text being true to translation , but allowing space for each individual translator to bring their own interpretation on the text, the performers carry, use and rip up books through out the play. White boxes become seats, city walls, a city under construction and supports for a forest of branches.
Puppets, masks lengths of fabric and paper boats are used throughout the play. That's not new, but it's great to see such inventiveness back on the stage of an adult production. It's a production which is fun, despite raising interesting questions about how far a translator has the right to adapt a classic work, and what happens when you want to change the story?
"Good design is all about making other designers feel like idiots because that idea wasn't theirs!"
Showing posts with label Set Designs seen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Set Designs seen. Show all posts
Monday, 26 September 2016
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
Going Dark at Young Vic, London
Friday, 25 March 2011
No Romance
I went to see No Romance, by Nancy Harris, at the Peacock on Wednesday. I thought the writing was great, and some great performances. I particularly liked the way the three plays were linked in such an understated way, just a subtle reference to a blog or a pair of stockings to link back to a previous play.
The set (Paul Keoghan) was attractive, but I reckon there was a lost opportunity to include visual links between the sets. The Roy Lichtenstein image in the first set hinted at a sense of foreboding, but I would have liked to see some visual reference, other than simply providing a venue for the actors, in the other two plays.
But a good night out at the theatre.
The set (Paul Keoghan) was attractive, but I reckon there was a lost opportunity to include visual links between the sets. The Roy Lichtenstein image in the first set hinted at a sense of foreboding, but I would have liked to see some visual reference, other than simply providing a venue for the actors, in the other two plays.
But a good night out at the theatre.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


